No. 20-7667
Troy Kendrick, Jr. v. United States
Tags: 5th-circuit falsified-evidence franks-standard franks-v-delaware judicial-review law-enforcement-misconduct probable-cause sentencing-guidelines wiretap wiretap-evidence
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-06-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When a law enforcement agent falsifies and misrepresents wiretap evidence to establish probable cause for a second wiretap, can a reviewing court rely on the agent's subjective beliefs about the misrepresented evidence to find probable cause and uphold its validity under Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is unwarranted, it should hold Mr. Kendrick’s petition pending resolution of Tabb. il
Docket Entries
2021-06-28
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
2021-06-08
Letter waiving the 14-day waiting period for the filing of a reply pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed.
2021-06-07
Memorandum of respondent United States of America filed.
2021-04-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 7, 2021.
2021-04-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 6, 2021 to June 7, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-04-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 6, 2021)
Attorneys
Troy Kendrick, Jr.
Samantha Jean Kuhn — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent