No. 20-7675
John G. Stroming v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: age-gender-differences child-molestation criminal-procedure criminal-propensity evidence evidence-admissibility evidentiary-rules federal-law prior-convictions propensity victim-characteristics
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-05-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether prior convictions for crimes of child molestation can be admitted into evidence where — because of differences in the age and gender of the victims — they do not show propensity to commit the particular crime charged
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether prior convictions for crimes of child molestation can be admitted into evidence where — because of differences in the age and gender of the victims — they do not show propensity to commit the particular crime charged. -2
Docket Entries
2021-05-17
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-04-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-03-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 7, 2021)
Attorneys
John Stroming
Tina Schneider — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent