Whether other act evidence under Rule 404(b) involving the same 'victim' is automatically admissible

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether other act evidence under Rule 404(b) that involves the same “victim” (alcoholic husband and wife who fight after drinking too much) is automatically admissible even if it does not prove “motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, absence of mistake, or lack of accident” or whether it is prohibited propensity evidence?