No. 20-7698
Derrick Michael Allen, Sr. v. Town of Cary Police Department, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Latest Conference:
2021-05-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the issue of action as frivolous and/or for failure to state a claim against the Town of Cary's Police Department and Police Chief Tom Decurtis is adequate (if the petitioner can prove facts to support his claim)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED COHETHeR TisuissAC OF ction As F¥ivaloos oud/or Foe Foilore TO Sve A Clain Aaginsr THE Tou) CF CARYS Police TDepearuenr ASD “Plice CHieF Toor Dezouits 13 ADE@oATE (Cotten PeTinoNmEr CAN prove FATS TO SOpper His Clain)?
Docket Entries
2021-05-24
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2021-05-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.
2021-04-16
Waiver of right of respondent Town of Cary Police Department, et al. to respond filed.
2021-04-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 10, 2021)
Attorneys
Derrick Michael Allen, Sr.
Derrick Michael Allen Sr. — Petitioner
Town of Cary Police Department, et al.
John T. Crook — Bailey & Dixon, LLP, Respondent