No. 20-770
John Nypl v. JPMorgan Chase & Co., et al.
Response Waived
Tags: burden-of-proof civil-procedure federal-law federal-rules-civil-procedure judicial-deference motion-to-quash non-party-witness nonparty-witness rule-45 subpoena subpoena-compliance
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the applicable burden on a moving-party seeking to quash the subpoena of a non-party witness under Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(d)(8) should be decided
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether this Court should decide an important question of federal law that has not been, but should be, settled by this Court, with regard to the applicable burden on a moving-party seeking to quash the subpoena of a non-party witness under Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(d)(8). Whether, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 45, the court where subpoena compliance is required must weigh and/or defer to the opinion of the court where the action is pending in ruling on a motion to quash the subpoena of a non-party witness.
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2020-12-10
Waiver of right of respondent Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. to respond filed.
2020-11-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 4, 2021)
Attorneys
John Nypl
Joseph Michaelangelo Alioto — Alioto Law Firm, Petitioner
Joseph Michaelangelo Alioto — Alioto Law Firm, Petitioner
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Kelly M. Klaus — Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Respondent
Kelly M. Klaus — Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Respondent