No. 20-7707
Charles Michael Ledford v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process plea-bargaining statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-05-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred by dismissing Mr. Ledford's meritorious arguments due to the appellate waiver language of the plea agreement
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW A. WHETHER THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERRED BY DISMISSING MR. LEDFORD’S MERITORIOUS ARGUMENTS DUE TO THE APPELLATE WAIVER LANGUAGE OF THE PLEA AGREEMENT. i
Docket Entries
2021-05-17
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-04-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-04-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 12, 2021)
Attorneys
Charles Ledford
James Edward Yeager Jr. — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent