Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights to due process, equal protection, freedom from cruel and unusual punishment, and freedom from unlawful search and seizure were violated

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 0 Loita Wiha Ni WnVFF Reswesz For fidmission ond aD/ Git iFE Fins7 RegvesT fox PRoluction ¢ x Documents Duel the Slifes Falvxze to fal/te Grdl Com pty tit ls CODE Meocechires as Fourd neder, SOCL EE 1919-Yof GF SSe, Gare Specially Sack F VPIUG-SOX pretsedice! flo Poy SAGA /1) his CONST POT 1ONG LS Le1GAPS 70.4 Lenin P06 jg ool H4e@ Right fo Chkective GSI sane OF Counses Une hie. The [4yZA fitadmtnT Cpe Protection Gad CCUG CNeoRtemernT” Gre! Che JRocess A45€, 94 AMtndmeal RIGI Ho be FRaCE Fron. CRUC/ gre , UNUS GS PiashmelT C pes? COndtTI0A Gctug/ JONOCENCE :) CoH Arcrdntaz terol to CB echt GSS tae OF Coun sf 5” bred en) erghT %o be Face pram CRE Gi Caysual JynishnentT (Pke-Coavicten Gclual ranecence) Gad the PEM” fa No7 ERI min~ Gre Hin SAI Gnel be (POCESES C laise “rr prene Jon wy Liohr #2 be Free Prhor Up lewtel Sewech aM! Sey2ue~e Or SWS Jensen On. Property ( including His [Ntellecteg / Pkspeaty ) Gnd [sv Aorcrdinert Fg hT fa Extteedom of Sth Grd New be ComPelled to 8 Peak as 1845 OWN defense end Prove #15 WNcxence, OF The Constitu fin oF the Unite Spates 07 Ameeria