No. 20-7721

Shannon Demond Dotson v. Tunica-Biloxi Gaming Commission, et al.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-04-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure consent-extension-of-time due-process evidence federal-jurisdiction jurisdiction legal-standing service-of-process standing subject-matter-jurisdiction tribal-law
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment Privacy Jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2021-06-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Why the courts never acknowledged that the plaintiff never consented to the Defendant request for Extension of Time?

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. : 1.Why the courts never acknowledged that | the plamtiit never consented to the Defendant request for Extension of Time? 2. Why the court did not acknowledged the documents in the case presenting the evidence of the many attempts I the Plaintiff and servers tried and sabotage the Defendants malfeasance tried to prevent? 3.Why the courts did not apply I the Plaintiff definite statement in the case correctly. 4. Why the courts err on the subject matter jurisdiction of the case when I the Plaintiff presented 28 U.S.C. 1332, 28 U.S.C. 1343, and 28 U.S.C.1367 in the | documents? 5. Why the courts did not acknowledge the proof of service was delivered to the Tribal Police Office where Cindy or Christy Smith resided stating that she was authorized to except the Summons from Bianca Smith? (Audio proof and Proof of Service) ,

Docket Entries

2021-06-14
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021.
2020-12-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 12, 2021)

Attorneys

Shannon Demond Dotson
Shannon Demond Dotson — Petitioner
Shannon Demond Dotson — Petitioner