Did the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit err when concluding that Davis adopted the goal of furthering or facilitating the criminal endeavor

No question identified. : “L, DID TH DECESIONOF THE ctuRT OF APPEALS FoR THE S\VTH CIRCUIT ERe Wien CONCLUDING THAT DAVIS ADOPIED THE GOAL OF FURTHERING OR FACELE TATING THE CRIMINAL ENDEAVOR LE Dey Te Decrsta Oe THE COUBT OF ApreaL FOR TRE SIVTH CIRCUIT CqUBT ERR WHEN OVEALOLKING THE BYCOMMEN NTI OF THE DISTALCT COURT WHICH ERAONE OUSLY RI/ZEDOM Tie ———FRESENTEINCING REPDAT WHICH MAKES THE RICO CONNCTEON NSEC |] | DID THE DECISIQW OF THE COURT OF Appeals FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT COURT ERB WHEN CONCLUDING THAT 7HE | DRUG AMwunT WAS ArASQNAEN FORE SEE ABLE “TO Davas WHEN REYING ON THE DESTRICT COURT DRUG ESTIMATE WHICH CLEARLY ERED WHEN ITS FINDING wAs THE ENTIRE CONSPIRACY WIDE DRUG AMOUNT” TV. DID THE DECrSCON OF THE UNITED S7m : | TES COURT OF APPEALS FORTRE SIXTH CIRCULT ERR Wiel OGRLAOKIVG THE Fact THAT DAVES FIETH AMENDMENT RIGHTS WERE VIOINTED OF DUE PROCESS AND DOUBLE JEOPARDY .