Whether the district and appeals courts erred in overlooking constitutional and civil rights violations

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Tssue and Facts overlooked by both» District, and appeals, _Court oF west Virgini® and Virginia. PlointiFF Dean, Case Thats upheld by the Consttu}lon» the ~ Fourth, FiFth And the _Fourtzenth, and eighth AMenidMen} Voolation oF the ConShitubion. Base on Ci9c4) Title wr oF the Civil Rights @ct Prohibits Any _EMployMent discrimiation, iF a Cuhite and Black) Person are _Employed al the Same Place or Business, Quid Are Fired because _oF Q Mosunderstanding between the bo oF then, At the Same Mine _but the Cunite Person] 86 (rehied back) a Few wees later thal, Clearly a discrimiaton. I Plainkikr Dean, was Not of Fered My. Sob back. The lower Courts made. uatdustly , unFarely Errors in _My Case, in all Essence My ceyel And Constitutional Mghts were Si Violated, Judge Cstanp \r.) overlooked She consi dulSon and _ didn't up hold the ~ Bivens actors “to raise @ higher Standard “oF The Bivens Clane, under the Fourth, TiFth and Fourteenth and the Eighth AMidMesst Veolatfons The lover Courks Also overlooked he Compete Administrabiwe Exhaustion, anid the error oF Yas ly not Tending bo raise Whe Strongest Arguments in PlainhiFFs Dean, Favor of €gua) Protection Claus oF the Cons tution Violatfon. This was” delberale ‘inteatfon indi FEerence Fut euiilful and Wanton discriminalion, with regard to Fareness . The Honorable _dudgz Stanip. sr. Also Made Error In My reguest For relick in My. Case... L_reguest wn the-Sum oF $ 100.000, Not #$ 1,000,000,00 _As_sudge. Shamp sr. Assume. For darages, | a