When colorably alleging a structural, constitutional violation, specifically, that an individual illegally exercised the powers of the office of the Attorney General in violation of the Appointments Clause, must a litigant show that he/she was prejudiced by such illegally acting individual?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED This case presents important questions of great constitutional magnitude regarding longstanding federal statutory law, to wit: 1. When colorably alleging a structural, constitutional violation, specifically, that an individual illegally exercised the powers of the office of the Attorney General in violation of the Appointments Clause, must a litigant show that he/she was prejudiced by such illegally acting individual? 2. When colorably alleging a that an individual illegally exercised the powers of the office of the Attorney General in violation of the statutory scheme prescribing the precise succession mechanisms, vwiz., the Federal Vacancies Reform Act, and the Attorney General Succession Act, must a litigant show that he/she was prejudiced by such illegally acting individual? i