Whether the lower courts erred in relying solely on a summary judgment report without addressing all documents and concerns raised by the plaintiff

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED This case involves some questions meriting argument: Why? (a) The US Court of Appeals, 5" Circuit and the US District Court Southern Division, — Brownsville relied solely on a two-page summary judgement report by Defendants without reviewing and addressing all the documents and concerns raised by Plaintiff prior to summary judgement report by Defendants prior to rendering any opinion. Courts failed to address the inconsistencies and contradictions in the fabricated or made up documents and summary judgement of Defendants. (details in the briefs) (a) The US Court of Appeals, 5“ Circuit, knowing Plaintiffs unfortunate filing status failed to address Plaintiffs pleas for Oral arguments by both sides to emphasize and clarify the limited information filed in the briefs before rendering any opinion. (c) The US District court, Southern Division, Brownsville, knowing Plaintiff's unfortunate filing status refused to grant Plaintiff’s request for time to respond to the insurmountable fabricated or made-up information two years after the facts by Defendants in their summary judgement report. (details in the briefs) (d) The US Court of Appeals, 5" circuit cited very damaging information against Plaintiff that are not indicated in Defendants’ report and the US District court, Southern Division, Brownsville opinions as the basis for its opinions. (e) The US Court of Appeals, 5“ Circuit did not appear to have seen and reviewed ; Plaintiff's briefs prior to rendering its opinions. (The briefs as shown in Appendices answered most of the questions that Plaintiff was not given opportunity by the District court to respond. The brief also provided insurmountable evidence that most of the so-called evidence by Defendants were made up way after Plaintiff was fired and could not have been used for reasons for his termination), and (f) What role did lack of legal representation of Plaintiff played in the opinions rendered by the Courts thus far. : Answers to these questions through Oral argument (opposed by Defendants in each case) could have affected the opinions by the lower courts and prevented the appearance in this Supreme Court.