Whether the trial court reversibly erred in admitting highly prejudicial and irrelevant evidence related to an alleged threat to Ms. Branson by Petitioner following the shooting incident with Mr. Tisdale

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED that essentially advocated oD ws stothen the prsecttiot . Coxe perce tHe veil of saicial impor tality | demonestro e the trial courk'5 fartiality foward the “Prosecution and improper y influence’ the sey ‘ey ‘creatine, an appearance “oF advocacy and partiality aopins Pelioner 2ta the alternative 1 WIS defense counsel ineCFechve Cor Fortin, te clogc\ As he. Leal Cousk's Questioninay of Mc Tisdale ang Ms. Bransun ! Tr. Did the trial court reversibly err ushen it admitted viop ly pre’pdician and irtelevont evidence reaped ino, an al lees Spreak to Ms. Orunsuny Oy Petitioner Folleusingy *he Shot ine, | inadent with Me. Tisdale ;