Did the district court's jury instruction impermissibly impair and redirect the jury's considerations of the evidence by adding words from civil regulations, tainting the proceedings in violation of the petitioner's due process rights?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (1) Did District court's Jury instruction impermissibly impair and redirect the jury's considerations of the evidence by adding word from Civil Regulations taint these proceeding in violation of Petitioner's Due Process Rights? (2) Did the Jury Instructions added Civil Regulations sway the Jury and taint these Jndicial proceedings? (3) Did the added érroneous: Jury Instructions usurped the jury's fact finding role? (4) Did the presence of a "biased" juror violate Petitioner's Sixth and Fifth Amendment Rights? . (5) Did a biased juror taint the Constitutional standards of a "Fair"Trial? (6) Did district court abuse its discretion by failing to remove the biased juror? (7) district court;Appellate court abused discretion by vsing decuments for their determinination in applying U.S.S.G § 2Bl1.1(b)(7)(iii)? (8) Was sentence procedurally unreasonable by applying enhancement : based on Non-Sheppard approved documents?