Andrew Indelicato Peterson v. S. Butler, Warden
SocialSecurity
Whether a defendant who has not served over a year in prison can assume his prior conviction was vacated for purposes of a felon-in-possession charge
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED © os the distied Coury USe Yost OM Cena Conduct A. crimes hat a om Newer Served Over a Year in Prison 40 ASSUINe i dekndand Meru Wis Shuts Prior to dre Rlemi oRfene. © Shoot) a Plen Moreemnt be Voile) base on a YWanrator] element Missing out tne Plen ONSeenern*re ela defendant Su had he been ony eel Of Steies thal he Looid lve Pracedted. to rie Status on hk “eavectment had te Prue bis \nowledac of +o Vacare. me of the Fedora ofLense e Wagl\ Anis Ge entush Wn AX delandand Conviction, det ue S He Conkirmaton With ones Kngwledoe to Stats Clemnk In a on Plea AdreeyneaOS Mar Plee, AArenmbre Shans SUp5¢s4ive\wowledge OF Felonie status b4 do SendanXS eWhod avewe ton defendants Jace Hurt Bited or Previons S$ Wee Metion Riot Yo w Yew Sutrem. Cour’ Where bevion Tuling © Does cr deRendnk rove a Pion bo be nohitied Li Mia\ Coort’s Lelore Acca LNY oO DUH Plan oF AN essential Clements Concerns be, A Prolibited Peson.