No. 20-7771

Anthony J. Bator v. David Nilsson, et al.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2021-04-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process legal-jurisdiction property-rights property-seizure siskiyou-county supreme-court-rulings takings
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-06-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights, including property rights, were violated by the wrongful taking of his property without due process of law

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED The petitioner was wrongfully convicted of multiple felonies in a highly unfair trial by a group pf bureaucrats that work in the legal community of Siskiyou County California. Mr. Bator, petitioner, is 100% completely innocent of the charges fabricated against him. Petitioner and his family owned property in Siskiyou County California. | Petitioners property was removed from the petitioner and his family in violation of petitioners constitutional rights, rulings of the United States Supreme Court, rulings of the California Supreme Court, the laws of the State of California, the Code of Civil Procedure and the rules of the courts. Do the rights, rulings, laws and rules protect the petitioner, who will eventually be proven 100% innocent, completely exonerated of all charges, protect the petitioner from the taking of petitioners property without the protection of the constitution or the rule of law? i

Docket Entries

2021-06-07
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
2021-05-01
Waiver of right of respondent David Nilsson, et al. to respond filed.
2021-02-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 17, 2021)

Attorneys

Anthony J. Bator, et al.
Anthony Joseph Bator — Petitioner
David Nilsson, et al.
David R. GriffithGriffith, Horn & Sheehan, LLP, Respondent