Whether the petitioner's due process rights were violated when the lower courts denied the petitioner's request for a hearing to challenge the government's seizure of their property

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : : Ltd luetHer Tee peestatenest ob Flor aws Wasle aba Le “TRSTIME Ly A f Cure VEE TO Tele (ove rAdury bea Ef Tre Perera hat Pues , AS at Ciusntutes whe a | tumpameptal Mise awnraGe oF ustace. dg. pubereleetele \ Tate eut7 Use¢ Tu preptt) ft Eee | Crd Wits pps THE PETLTICLER AS bE IMO AL Aemet Labora Cetin. | a © Seuuletawe Post Teted Cse lions Tut Gee HVe For : batlauo peeve et tilt Petrie’ (iastocuticenl Cagettwa Cart ietal pevltss . fe pluereiee Ap pellate by sels Fieewrrete | ECL Tlexts i awk Eeurtel Appellate (acre TS Weve 4 treme Fee Fanbew Fle A Mert Beate, . 5, tulvereter tele Coat Cyserd reek pA Wsamo-tele Srae Wa lave THE Novae | pet A PUTO THE Petrruver on Loree rt was Sees (ere wbet Team er { eUTEveIUG APEC THE PETTERS Bevel Teal a G wheteeetHe lent eCuetneel hk Al lus oTeel cE a To [ey THE PETIT VER FST cw wut Ruch Like! enn rel WHtHout AW Uh erlyaud OFEVSE.