Whether a 1963 civil rights action can be treated as an administrative proceeding, whether a court has jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter presented within the tribunal, whether a court can enter a final judgment rather than remand for further administrative proceedings, whether a court has established a meritorious constitutional violation, whether a court has jurisdiction to appoint counsel, whether a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 requires exhaustion of administrative remedies before filing

No question identified. : Qurestlons Presented . * A Lontfove So Aaksiaa e Course o A 1963 Chvt pala hk acto as a Admintstrative Proceeding, « Poes ATH «Sets AG DSurksdicl on Xtend the Author! ty to Adfudivote, the matter so presented uilthln the bAhunal & Lt Pavel ¢ Hoes A Cow ck Ete By Sudgement sithar B a ay 2dtpalon an the, Me t+5 of Racks In oh alan RY Admint stratlye Proceeding Sp.oftstn a Ww lont roversy withla the couse Bedore the Court ® T,. Havt stablish A Mecttorenus Consttuttonal Violate pond that the bi Ww, EK Lab hear ot the | eg indhen Presem | A dye uct d urhsdiotton to hoo Deltnatton ot A ott : Un Re, pond? a 0 mirovyee u Ptyvote Securl NOAwy Ene bem En 2d to Qualdtted Lo indty @ “ an, . ) ) an g attr having Been Set ioe rod * 2 f ted adue_fo ad aki ¥) 1H Rey ex unkoAl on Oy Cou el Old the Court Err: fad iSSal without _dererm otton t Ap platment or Den unsel ° Lees Gursed Become c Kt 3 +? : TL. A petition whom Piles @ ctvtlRtghts Complaint fursuant to HAUSC 41983 + o xcesdtve dor e + Heltberute ath te CACR + Dental t A Cao) VO beagl 0 etal ad Subsequently Released trom tustedy Joes 42u S49 ]eta) exhaustion kequs LMen Bor Rellet: then fetoner Attemots to tle Cycle eo, trom 7 olat To ¢ , of] ) kepresentutive) Alby Zh Lf -AehF 3:3-dl vil eh) ¢ | bd at Paces of Al ? c+te do nN Ased hh the 0 fo yi Lye Overt PAAe _A IR } J ot Hal ps ttfon hs Dolls i | Trtattra Boone -Ler Serag 230 Ch nty Form Road Co po | Adam Ambrose Yadsor ME 3799 . Rone Pug Counsed for Oedendants t = | | . WomAlés BOND + PICUZASon | Rud I ] Cyallon US ~ LEP Horncar’ ok Le ‘ un ts, R. Mar aon DA Lala sto a-Sclem NS x Lb | } ; ; Reloted Gse) EOL, Abdu-Saltm (ould ve Berle Coby ‘ap SU4-C4-3066-F i ONC Abdu Salt Jod Vi Beit “ + © por SiS -CTS066 F 3 Authost zed Representallve | Asc dec ip alla PeQyodPines — , Table of Content Opinion eau Juris d FH on a onsPtuttonal and Stalutory Prowks f Tovilved | tare Me, 4 LAS a a Append KA. US COA: 4th ofr, no, 20THY Audaeme December AI, 2030 Apoerdry Bt US Con Hele no. 14-Tld Loleclocirte Appeal Sudoemen Adrendiy Cs US0C-£0NCWD Sudog wt-Order Du 2 2030 | A ggeadsy Oi 1A) Dolked Entry Sheet as i July 3d) 2020 + 00. SUT-CT21 36-9 Table ot Authorttes Cited © Davis heres, 40% US 1¥4 195 C14G4 ald O Dovid son vi de Stabe: file o. Stlb-CW-1G2-REV-OSC 212 wh 5208033 ot * 2 20. Ny * Oot Ad ,.d0ld p ©) Socho vs Hoy» zd 110,164 (dd coke, 200’ § © &s ile 2GOe 29 0S 17° 04 -05 (1476 © Feabrak Cary In Supsi © Heckler vw. Community Health Service 467.US Sl ot 54 60 8 O Lko vy, Shreye: 535 F.3d 295 448 £008 (quoting Litlitanns 72234763) ab Atoa Slay : 135 A, ab O Kinastey 135 S.ck A466 (2016) Jd at 2473 (olttna Groham vi Connor) pb a fo . | ). 0 O bichordson vii alght52 £5 399; Heb-1a C199 a4 a 5 USC4 552 (o)(O)(AVO fi. 10 Fed i Cty. P, 60 (b)(4 0.4 ce ee AS UDR TK Yat Me COURT OF THE UNTTED STATES | Poi One Kespecd ‘L hes Ae sy tnot_A ls ob 2ritn Ras ! tsSue 0 | Kz lau rh 2 LLORM 24 Belg _ , Optatnns Belpuc | 1 | © O40 ER 0) the, ! ed STC LUA Ly Hog PHD * oO Ne. TOLL ~ Ad De MW oF Vert ton lo} ox tag aa A, or Apo-eo a: . q A poe Siv A TO TRL Vo) DAU ag i c {\ JLDUKS ALO | — a, i O Oot a | YA p po. Dote YEO A * Of g eft HOR LOLs Cyl p peat ; Wo he, VOUMTA A ‘ Apeeacs fx A ndendty o ths petition no ks } Af 4) aw aed 4| \ ) f, i (8 ORD Bf u ML) EAN + oH Un 2 OTALe, Ne. walen EDN ~ WO JF 7 Lugo § L020. erat oe wt