No. 20-7785

Kevino Graham v. United States

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2021-04-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-vagueness criminal-procedure criminal-statute due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel human-trafficking sixth-amendment statutory-interpretation vagueness
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2021-05-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether petitioner Graham was denied his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel when counsel failed to challenge

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (A.) "WHETHER PETITIONER GRAHAM WAS DENIED HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL WHEN COUNSEL FAILED TO CHALLENGE; "WHETHER 18 U.S.C. 1591(a) IS UNCONSTITUTIONALLY VAGUE?" ; (B.) "WHETHER 18 U.S.C. 1591(a) IS UNCONSTITUTIONALLY VAGUE BECAUSE OF THE CLEAR UNCERTAINTY AS TO "WHETHER THE STATUTE DEFINES ONE OFFENSE OR MULTIPLE OFFENSES?"

Docket Entries

2021-05-17
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-04-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-01-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 17, 2021)

Attorneys

Kevino Graham
Kevino Graham — Petitioner
Kevino Graham — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent