Whether Florida Statutes and case law have deprived the petitioner of his liberty and a fair hearing, in violation of the 14th Amendment

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Petitioner, Obidiah McCaskill, Jr. request review of Florida Statutes and : case law that have deprived Petitioner of his liberty and been deprived of a fair hearing which violates Petitioner’s 14" Amendment . The Supervised Release -. . .'. Statutes is unconstitutional because it violates the right to trial under the Fifth and .. ~. Sixth Amendment. 1988 Supplement to Florida Statutes 1987 clearly states S. So 775.084:4(d)(e) see Appenldix'E” F.S. 775.084 1988 Supplement to Florida Statutes | i 1987. There is also a conflict in Florida Statutes 944.275(2)(c) (1995) and 944.275(2)(c) 1988 Supplement to Florida Statutes1987 they both have different language. That is a conflict in statutes. The Trial court failed to consider the issues | that was raised in which the trial court erred in failing to address. The trial court was required to address the issues that was brought before them, Florida’s . Conditional Release Supervision Release Statutes is unconstitutional See Hayman . v. United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, 869 F.3d 1153; 2017 U.S. App. Lexis 16747 Petitioner has been denied due process in which he is guaranteed by the Constitution. See Statement of Case for Support. 6 : JURISDICTION [ ] For cases from federal courts: : The date on which the United States Court of Appeals decided my case was . [ ] No petition for rehearing was timely filed in my case. ' *. :['] A timely petition for rehearing was denied by the United States Court of appeals 7 ’ .: on the foHowing date: , and a copy of the order denying rehearing appears at