No. 20-7789
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: district-of-columbia district-of-columbia-code due-process exhaustion-of-remedies ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-recusal procedural-exhaustion savings-clause state-remedies
Latest Conference:
2021-05-13
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the scope of the savings clause under District of Columbia Code Section 23-110(g) is open to a claim supported by judicial failure to recuse?
Whether petitioner's ineffective assistance of counsel claim has exhausted District of Columbia state remedies?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the scope of the savings clause under District of Columbia Code Section 23-110(g) is open to a claim supported by judicial failure to recuse?
Docket Entries
2021-05-17
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-04-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-04-03
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 17, 2021)
Attorneys
Michael K. Ciacci
Michael K. Ciacci — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent