No. 20-7789
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: district-of-columbia district-of-columbia-code due-process exhaustion-of-remedies ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-recusal procedural-exhaustion savings-clause state-remedies
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-05-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the scope of the savings clause under District of Columbia Code Section 23-110(g) is open to a claim supported by judicial failure to recuse?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether the scope of the savings clause under District of Columbia Code Section 23-110(g) is open to a claim supported by judicial failure to recuse? Whether petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim has exhausted District of Columbia state remedies? \ | .
Docket Entries
2021-05-17
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-04-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-04-03
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 17, 2021)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent