No. 20-7791

Shalamar Carmon v. Eric Armel, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Fayette, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2021-04-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 6th-amendment constitutional-rights criminal-homicide due-process fourteenth-amendment procedural-defect sixth-amendment specific-offense vague-statement
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-06-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was Petitioner denied due process of law

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; (1) Was Petitioner denied due process of law, in viorptfon of the 6th amend. . : . : of the U.S.Const., of the grounds that the ihtdabatioh he was confronted with, was a vague written statement of dispensable facts that kept the nature of the accusation against him ambiguous? : : (2) Was Petitioner denied due process of 1} Anjviolptton of the 6th amend. . of the U.S.Const., om the grounds that, for one count! of the general offense of criminal homicide, the information failed to state the specific offense charged under the statute he was alleged to have violated? (3) Was Petitioner denied due process of in ivan of the 14th amend. of the U.S.Cconst., on the grounds that he was convicted upon a charge not : made? : : ; : . . i i : i !

Docket Entries

2021-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2021-04-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 17, 2021)

Attorneys

Shalamar Carmon
Shalamar Carmon — Petitioner
Shalamar Carmon — Petitioner