Shalamar Carmon v. Eric Armel, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Fayette, et al.
DueProcess
Was Petitioner denied due process of law
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; (1) Was Petitioner denied due process of law, in viorptfon of the 6th amend. . : . : of the U.S.Const., of the grounds that the ihtdabatioh he was confronted with, was a vague written statement of dispensable facts that kept the nature of the accusation against him ambiguous? : : (2) Was Petitioner denied due process of 1} Anjviolptton of the 6th amend. . of the U.S.Const., om the grounds that, for one count! of the general offense of criminal homicide, the information failed to state the specific offense charged under the statute he was alleged to have violated? (3) Was Petitioner denied due process of in ivan of the 14th amend. of the U.S.Cconst., on the grounds that he was convicted upon a charge not : made? : : ; : . . i i : i !