Is Troxel v Granville correctly applied to a case that has nothing to do with grandparents' visitation requests, but is used, nevertheless, as grounds to deny a custodial, in loco parentis grandmother's constitutional right of familial association?

No question identified. : IV. RULE 14: 1(a) QUESTIONS 1. Is Troxel v Granville correctly applied to a case that has nothing to do with grandparents’ visitation requests, but is used, nevertheless, as grounds to deny a custodial, in loco parentis grandmother's constitutional right of familial association? 2. Should violations of state statutes that mirror federal laws and were enacted specifically : to protect U.S. Constitutional Due Process rights be dismissed, just because they involve state laws? 3. Is it unconstitutional to limit liberty deprivations caused by harm to a person’s reputation only to deprivations that are employment-related? 4. When government agents; through false allegations, along with due process and other violations, damage a citizen’s reputation and then, themselves, use the court-recorded defamations they create to further deprive that person of constitutionally protected liberties, should they be exempt from liability just because they didn’t widely publicize the stigmatizing records they created? 5. ts procuring an order, alone, sufficient authority for social workers to invade an individual’s privacy if it doesn’t meet the first requirement of the Fourth Amendment protection, i.e. the right to protection against unreasonable searches and seizures?” 6. Should immunity protections extend to social services agents whenever they fabricate evidence and/or violate procedural due process and other clearly established state and federal laws enacted to protect constitutional rights—even when performing ministerial duties? 7. Should a sheriff who unlawfully interferes with the delivery of legally subpoenaed documents be blanketly protected from a civil rights lawsuit? 8. Should police officers who forcibly enter a home, without any semblance of a warrant or order, be protected from liability just because Plaintiff was unable to initially procure the officers’ names, using Officer Doe 1, etc, in the initial filing? ii V. RULE 14 1.(b) i