Whether the Fourth Circuit's decision finding reasonableness in the sentence imposed by the district court is contrary to the Fifth Amendment due process clause and the Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial with impartial jury, compulsory process, notice of charges, and assistance of counsel

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. THE FOURTH CIRCUIT’S DECISION FINDING REASONABLENESS IN THE SENTENCE IMPOSED BY THE DISTRICT COURT IS CONTRARY TO THE FIFTH AMENDMENT DUE PROCESS CLAUSE FOR IT DEPRIVES PETITIONER OF LIBERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS BY OPEN AND NOTORIOUS MANIPULATION OF DISCOVERY INFORMATION AND USE OF A CONFIDENTIAL SENTENCING DOCUMENT AGAINST THE DEFENDANT. Il. THE FOURTH CIRCUIT’S DECISION IS CONTRARY TO THE SIXTH AMENDMENT WHICH REQUIRES DEFENDANTS TO: HAVE IMPARTIALITY; HAVE COMPULSORY PROCESS; BE INFORMED OF THE NATURE AND CAUSE OF THE ACCUSATION; AND HAVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL. i