1). Does 21 U.S.C. § 331 (U) (3A) Of Prohibited Act(s) Pertain to Violation(s) Of Administrative Regulations 407 & 600 by Respondent(s), as Well as The Noted And Observed Violation(s) by Ben Mathew(s) And Sherri Wood(s) (Ark. Dept. Of Health Routine Food Inspector(s)) (see Doc. 77-1, Pg. 32 Thru 38 of 40), While Under Color Of STATE.

2). Were Each One of The Named Respondent(s) Under Color Of State Law, When The Civil Violations And State/Federal Code(s) Were Breached (see Doc. 46-0, Pg. 6 of 6 (d) & Doc. 77-1, Pg.(s) 32 Thru 38 of 40)

3). When a State Prisoner is Subjected to Serious Harm From Reckless Indifference of A State Employee That is To Ensure Safety And Sanitations Prohibition(s) Thu Their Official Job Description(s), Instruction(s) To Perform Or Carry Out Such Dutie(s) And Responsibilitie(s), is The State Prisoner Then Entitled to Remuneration For Such Documented Injurie(s) That Show(s) as Lasting Over (30) Day(s) (see Doc. 51-1, Pg.(s) 3 & 4 Of 17 And Doc. 36-1, Pg.(s) 15 & 16 of 46)

4). While Answering Interrogatories(s), Are The Receiving Defendant(s) (Respondents) Allowed to Falsify Their Statement(s) Thru Contradiction(s), Vagueness or Perplexingly Utilizing Objections Method(s) When The Interrogatorie(s) Are Clearly Substantial And Based Off The Scientific Research of Fact Disclosed Within The 2012 Epidemiologic Investigation That They Are to Be Aware Of, While Being Within The Scope Of Their Job Description, Instruction(s) To Perform Or Carry Out Such Dutie(s) And Responsibilitie(s). (See Doc. 92-0 on Bond & SMARJESSI)

Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions