No. 20-7817
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process gonzalez-precedent gonzalez-vs-crosby indigent-plaintiff judgment judgment-reopening legal-standing multi-defendant-litigation standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus Securities
SocialSecurity DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should an indigent plaintiff that's suing three defendants be permitted to reopen his judgment if he possess the two components of Gonzalez vs. Crosby?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED SHOULD AN INDIGENT PLAINTIFF THAT'S SUING THREE DEFENDANTS BE PERMITTED TO REOPEN HIS JUDGMENT IF HE POSSESS THE TWO COMPONENTS OF GONZALEZ VS. CROSBY?
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-09-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-02
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-06-14
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021.
2021-05-21
Waiver of right of respondent State of Florida to respond filed.
2021-04-06
Petition for a writ of prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 21, 2021)
Attorneys
State of Florida
Douglas T. Squire — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Douglas T. Squire — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent