No. 20-7823

Alan Trowbridge v. Jeffrey Woods, Warden

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-04-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review counsel-deficiency criminal-procedure federal-law habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-precedent prejudice sixth-amendment sixth-circuit strickland-standard strickland-v-washington
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2021-06-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decide an important question of federal law in a way that conflicts with this Court's holding in Strickland v. Washington?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. Did the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decide an important question of federal law in a way that conflicts with this Court’s holding in Strickland v. Washington? ii

Docket Entries

2021-06-28
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
2021-06-08
Waiver of right of respondent Jeffrey Woods, Warden to respond filed.
Main Document
2021-04-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 24, 2021)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Alan Trowbridge
Rachel Laura-Heiss Frank — Springstead Bartish Borgula & Lynch PLLC, Petitioner
Jeffrey Woods, Warden
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent