Whether the petitioner's Fifth Amendment rights to substantive and procedural due process were infringed upon due to the father-son relationship between opposing counsel and a Maine Supreme Court justice

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Opposing Counsel in this case was the law firm of Jabar, Laliberty, and Dubord, LLC, and lead counsel for that law firm is George Jabar, son of Justice Joseph Jabar of The Maine Supreme Court. Petitioner was constantly and continually disenfranchised by The Maine Courts in this case, and Petitioner asserts that the father/son relationship of George Jabar and Justice Joseph Jabar has led to the infringement by The Maine Courts, including the Maine State Supreme Court, upon Petitioner’s Fifth Amendment Rights to Substantive and Procedural Due Process in this Eviction Case. 2. Opposing Counsel George Jabar is/was the Elected Official in charge of oversight of The Kennebec County Sheriffs Office. Petitioner delivered no less than eight different signed, sworn, and notarized Police Reports to that Sheriffs Office describing abuses visited upon him by the Respondent’s other tenants, and at no time did that Sheriffs Office respond to or address any of the Petitioners substantial claims of abuse and illegal behavior being visited upon him by respondent’s tenants. Petitioner was instructed by the Maine Attorney General’s Office to contact George Jabar in regards to this situation, and he has, and George Jabar has likewise refused to contact the Petitioner in any way regarding the complete lack of assistance from the Kennebec County Sheriff's Office. George Jabar, Elected Official with oversight of the Kennebec County Sheriffs Office and son of Maine Supreme Court Justice Joseph Jabar, then proceeded to prosecute this eviction case through his law firm on behalf of the Respondent, the Petitioner was made to look like the agitator instead of Respondent’s other tenants and despite the eight police reports Petitioner had filed to the contrary, and Petitioner was evicted. Therefore Petitioner asserts his Fourth Amendment Rights to Equal Access to and Protection Under the Law has been infringed upon. 3. Petitioner has made The Courts (both Maine State and Federal) aware of the Fact that he has been tortured and at no time have any of those Courts complied with the Geneva Conventions against Torture, to which the United States is a signed participant and is therefore bound to uphold. Thus Petitioner asserts that he has been and is being subject to Cruel and Unusual Punishment(s), a violation of his Eighth and Ninth Amendment Rights.