No. 20-7831

Lena Lasher v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2021-04-22
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review constitutional-rights controlled-substances-act defective-indictment drug-definition ex-post-facto food-drug-cosmetics-act indictment-defect lack-of-physical-evidence
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Patent
Latest Conference: 2021-05-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Appellate Court deny the Plaintiff her constitutional rights by denying her Appeal 18-2693 (L) without addressing the District Court's violations?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Did the Appellate Court denied the Plaintiff her constitutional right by denying her _ Appeal 18-2693 (L) without addressing the District Court’s violation of EX POST FACTO Clause law? I. Did the Appellate Court denied the Plaintiff her constitutional right by denying her Appeal 18-2693 (L) without addressing the District Court’s violation of: A. The CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT (CSA) and B. The legal definition of the word “DRUG” which is found in The Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act and referred to in the Controlled Substances Act. Ill. Did the Appellate Court denied the Plaintiff her constitutional right by denying her Appeal 18-2693 (L) without addressing the Flaw in the defective indictment and lack of physical evidence? , (i)

Docket Entries

2021-05-24
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2021-05-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.
2021-05-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main Document
2020-09-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 24, 2021)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Lena Lasher
Lena Lasher — Petitioner
Lena Lasher — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent