Has prejudice been shown where the prosecuting attorney allowed false evidence and inaccurate information to go uncorrected?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Question: Has prejudice been shown where the prosecuting attorney, whether intentional or unintentional, allowed false evidence and inaccurate information to go uncorrected, and instead, elicited the false/perjured testimony of a State's expert witness to be presented in support of such false evidence and inaccurate information? Thus, the jury was not apprised of the fact that the State's expert witness was attesting to a DNA match that was actually inconclusive and not supported by the evidence in her possession. 2. Question: Has prejudice been shown where defense counsel failed to elicit through cross-examination and/or : present evidence to the fact that, Petitioner's co-defendant and State's key witness had a bias, motive to lie, or interest to testify on bahalf of the party and office that had control over his pending charges. The prototypical bias standard was set out in Delaware v. Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. 673 (1986). IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of habeas corpus issue to review the judgment below. OPINIONS BELOW This case is from federal courts: The Opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the : Eighth Circuit appears at