No. 20-7838

Edward M. Vargas, Sr. v. Craig Koenig, Warden

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-04-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: conspiracy conspiracy-charge criminal-indictment criminal-procedure due-process fair-notice indictment jury-conviction jury-instructions ninth-circuit
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-05-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Ninth Circuit misapplied this Court's precedents in ruling that Petitioner was not denied fair notice of the charges against him despite the jury convicting him of conspiring to murder two individuals not named in the indictment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Ninth Circuit misapplied this Court’s precedents in ruling that Petitioner was not denied fair notice of the charges against him despite the jury convicting him of conspiring to murder two individuals not named in the indictment. i

Docket Entries

2021-05-17
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-04-26
Waiver of right of respondent Craig Koenig to respond filed.
Main Document
2021-04-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 24, 2021)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionProof of Service

Attorneys

Craig Koenig
Gregory A. Ott — California Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Edward Vargas
Elizabeth Richardson-Royer — Petitioner