No. 20-7842
Eliu Elixander Lorenzana-Cordon v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion district-court-procedure due-process extradition extradition-notice international-law judicial-discretion jurisdiction motion-for-new-trial notice treaties treaty-violation
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2021-05-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the District Court abuse its discretion by denying the motion for a new trial without taking into consideration that the document of extradition that showed Petitioner was not provided with proper notice prior to be extradited in violation of the treaties between the United States and Guatemala of 1903 and 1940?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . Did the District Court abuse it's discretion by denying the motion for a new trial without taking into consideration that the document of extradition that showed Petitioner was not provided with proper notice prior to be extradited in violation of the treatie between the United States and Guatemala of 1903 and 1940? | |
Docket Entries
2021-05-24
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.
2021-05-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-02-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 26, 2021)
Attorneys
Eliu Elixander Lorenzana-Cordon
Eliu Elixander Lorenzana-Cordon — Petitioner
Eliu Elixander Lorenzana-Cordon — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent