Whether the state district court lost subject matter jurisdiction by rendering the judgment of conviction void when it failed to comply with the requirements of Rion v. Louisiana, 138 S.Ct. 1500 (2018) and Ramos v. Louisiana, 140 S.Ct. 1390 (2020)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED i, Dio THe STATE DISTRICT MOURT Lose SUBTECT M 4TH. TURICDICTIOR) — | RENDERING THE Awe mest of Guvnrcrgny void WHE IT FAILED TO OME WIT THE REE?CUMEMENT 0F NEion LEUSEO speucre 171. 18°BYD) ava APALT ANoTHeR AcIOaNE¢ 70 pefleseor Petimroneé ween Meic JerenoeZs FLED A MOI) TO WITHORAL AioM KEMes SINE CeTicen C a. Stow THe JEcslow of MEtoy « Lousiana, 1388.0 isda (201g) BE ThE (ER AS A WATERSHED RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCELUKE THAT S00) BE AFFLLED (ETROACTTIORCP Te COLATERAL MEOCRELAOS. £ 5 CAO 8 ARUN AL DEFIANT RELE 6x Mcrae » Lamvava, I3e S.Cr. isco (2019) HOLOING THAT A CRIMNMAL DERNDAIT CAN NOT BE FORCEM TO ACLOCO His DEFENSE ATOZNEY TO GOoncepe His GUILT; AS A FACTOR, CU4fEr0 ASSESS. , QwileTyHe 0 ROT A CMMNAL DEFENDAST KROWUNG! F ANNO (NTELLEGEATEY WAIUED HIS RIGHT TO ern ? oR WAS he Cceeceo Ul