No. 20-7844

Paul Patrick Jolivette, Jr. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-04-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection federal-jurisdiction fourteenth-amendment judicial-discretion sovereign-immunity
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the United States Court of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit Order in 'DENIAL' of a writ of mandate to enforce a judgment Registeered and entered in the United States District Court of California Northern District to command and compel the USDC Northern to issue writs of enforcement to full satisfaction and accord to all terms, conditions, stipulations and monetary award as expressed in the Abstract of Judgment, after the People of the State of California's Specific Waiver of immunity, and all franchise protection as expressed in the Certified Abstract of Judgment, action DENY the Petitioner First essential right to Due Process and Equal Protection as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amend U.S. Constitution, aid Specifically Section 5, laws and treaties, in accordance to 28 USC § 3202

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , 1. ' Did the United States Court of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit Order in " DENIAL " of a writ of mandate to enforce a judgment Registeered and entered in the United States District Court of California Northern District to command and compel the USDC Northern to issue writs of enforcement to full satisfaction and accord to all terms,: conditions, stipulations and monetary award as expressed in the Abstract of Judgment, . after the People of the State of California's Specific Waiver of immunity, ; and all franchise protection as expressed in the Certified Abstract of Judgment, action DENY the Petitioner First essential right to Due Process and Equal Protection as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amend U.S. Constitution, aid Specifically Section 5, laws and treaties, in accordance to 28 USC § 3202. 2. Did the Respondent abuse it's discrection by failing to exercise under Title 42 usc § 1983, and under " Equity" supplemental jurisdiction for Civil Contempt in accordance to the expressed terms, conditions, stipulation, and monetary award in the Abstract of Judgment. 2 of 20 ,

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-09-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-20
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-06-28
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
2020-12-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 26, 2021)

Attorneys

Paul Jolivette
Paul Patrick Jolivette Jr. — Petitioner
Paul Patrick Jolivette Jr. — Petitioner