Paul Patrick Jolivette, Jr. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California
DueProcess
Did the United States Court of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit Order in 'DENIAL' of a writ of mandate to enforce a judgment Registeered and entered in the United States District Court of California Northern District to command and compel the USDC Northern to issue writs of enforcement to full satisfaction and accord to all terms, conditions, stipulations and monetary award as expressed in the Abstract of Judgment, after the People of the State of California's Specific Waiver of immunity, and all franchise protection as expressed in the Certified Abstract of Judgment, action DENY the Petitioner First essential right to Due Process and Equal Protection as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amend U.S. Constitution, aid Specifically Section 5, laws and treaties, in accordance to 28 USC § 3202
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , 1. ' Did the United States Court of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit Order in " DENIAL " of a writ of mandate to enforce a judgment Registeered and entered in the United States District Court of California Northern District to command and compel the USDC Northern to issue writs of enforcement to full satisfaction and accord to all terms,: conditions, stipulations and monetary award as expressed in the Abstract of Judgment, . after the People of the State of California's Specific Waiver of immunity, ; and all franchise protection as expressed in the Certified Abstract of Judgment, action DENY the Petitioner First essential right to Due Process and Equal Protection as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amend U.S. Constitution, aid Specifically Section 5, laws and treaties, in accordance to 28 USC § 3202. 2. Did the Respondent abuse it's discrection by failing to exercise under Title 42 usc § 1983, and under " Equity" supplemental jurisdiction for Civil Contempt in accordance to the expressed terms, conditions, stipulation, and monetary award in the Abstract of Judgment. 2 of 20 ,