Did the Ninth Circuit err by not 'second guessing' the decision of the state court as to the timing of Mr. Minor's petition, when the state court decision did not take into account the filing of a new intervening judgment that re-started Mr. Minor's post-conviction statute of limitations?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the Ninth Circuit err by not “second guessing” the decision of the state court as to the timing of Mr. Minor’s petition, when the state court decision did not take into account the filing of a new intervening judgment that re-started Mr. Minor’s post-conviction statute of limitations? 2. Did the Ninth Circuit decide an important question of federal law that has not been, but should be, settled by this Court, specifically what constitutes a “new intervening judgment” for purposes of Title 28 United States Code Section 2244? i