No. 20-7852

John Elmer v. Louisiana

Lower Court: Louisiana
Docketed: 2021-04-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: burden-of-proof criminal-procedure due-process in-re-winship jackson-v-virginia sufficiency-of-evidence
Key Terms:
ERISA JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-06-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the State failed to meet the stringent burden of proof as established by Jackson v. Virginia and In re: Winship

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Reasonable jurists would determine that the State failed to meet the stringent burden of proof as established by Jackson y. Virginia and In re: Winship.

Docket Entries

2021-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2021-05-26
Waiver of right of respondent State of Louisiana to respond filed.
Main Document
2021-04-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 26, 2021)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

John Elmer
John Elmer — Petitioner
John Elmer — Petitioner
State of Louisiana
Elizabeth Baker Murrill — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Elizabeth Baker Murrill — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent