No. 20-7862

In Re Momolu V. S. Sirleaf, Jr.

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2021-04-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-provisions court-review due-process federal-courts immigration-law jurisdiction standing state-courts statutory-provisions
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-05-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the AE DPA rescedoraly ar veld Sodgmer C8) dis

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . |, Does AE DPA rescedoraly ar veld Sodgmer C8) dis . : a iv $0; °C. A . . Seton ean sera i Gi Red be re U.5-5-6& the Beavis inte questa of (ks Parental Not catton Statute — Barns Yo alren Prox yy fathers — wieo have not wie ed Poerr Gacental era, Wh $ ad against Thee . mase CWE fem wile are U.S Gtizen $s, as besccibed \nerein ; pass U.S. Consttohongt + Mus tel os . And id nat, 2B USC. § 243) maybe applicable | lewever neither the fede ra | Courks o¢ the Maryland State courts have Cectifed te either the state attorney general — Yue faced that the Constitvrionatity of satd n Sketuke o& Laok State was dtawn tn to quecheon — Ot Lo tbe U.Gh Tom ey Geneva the fet Wek boklktie Ext Labor Standards Act 24 USCA. § 203 (1) 124 CFR g §70-1(b), t the Suvenile Tustice and 0: elinguentcy Prevention Act ALN SCR SES 60-6785 Consdititionality te

Docket Entries

2021-05-24
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.
2021-03-26
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 27, 2021)

Attorneys

Momolu Sirleaf
Momolu V. S. Sirleaf Jr. — Petitioner