Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the government should be foreclosed from relying on prior litigation that it concedes incorrectly invoked a procedural bar to review on the merits to argue that the district court lacked habeas corpus jurisdiction because the petitioner had a prior adequate and effective opportunity to test the legality of his detention under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the government should be foreclosed from relying on prior litigation that it concedes incorrectly invoked a procedural bar to review on the merits to argue that the district court lacked habeas-corpus-jurisdiction because the petitioner had a prior adequate-and-effective-opportunity-to-test-the-legality-of-his-detention-under-28-usc-2255e
2021-08-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-06
Reply of petitioner Martin G. Lewis filed.
2021-07-28
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2021-06-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including July 28, 2021.
2021-06-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 28, 2021 to July 28, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-05-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 28, 2021.
2021-05-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 28, 2021 to June 28, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-04-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 28, 2021)