Whether the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction

QUESTIONS PRESENTED L. Whether the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Mr. Walker’s case because the indictment failed to state an offense against the laws of the United States. I. Whether, when applying plain-error review based on an intervening United States Supreme Court decision, a circuit court of appeals may review matters outside the trial record to determine whether the error affected a defendant’s substantial rights or impacted the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of the trial. i PROCEEDINGS IN FEDERAL TRIAL AND APPELLATE COURTS DIRECTLY RELATED TO THIS CASE United States Supreme Court: Jemone Walker v. United States, 140 S. Ct. 823 (Jan. 13, 2020) (No. 19-6752) (denying certiorari review of original Eleventh Circuit opinion) United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit: United States v. Jemone Walker, 793 F. App’x 865 (11th Cir. Oct. 30, 2019) (No. 19-10792) (original Eleventh Circuit opinion affirming in part, vacating in part, and remanding for further proceedings) United States v. Jemone Walker, 835 F. App’x 524 (11th Cir. Nov. 24, 2020) (No. 20-10479) (Eleventh Circuit opinion affirming district court judgment entered on remand) United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida: United States v. Jemone Walker, 2019 WL 1494734 (M.D.Fla. Feb. 26, 2019) (No. (original district court judgment) United States v. Jemone Walker, 2020 WL 1277629 (M.D.Fla. Jan. 24, 2020) (No. (district court judgment on remand) ii