Did the court of appeals err in using the harmless error rule to resolve the illegal search and seizure of $8,300?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW BY THE COURT. I. Did the court of appeals err in using the harmless error rule to resolve the illegal search and seizure of $8,300? IL. Was the career offender guideline range applied in error based on convictions that amounted to attempt offenses and thus do not meet the guideline definition of “controlled substance offense”? 2 \ DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS AND FINANCIAL INTEREST Pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 14.1(b) and 29.6, Britt Cobb makes the following disclosure on behalf of the Petitioner: 1, Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? NO 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, that has a financial interest in the outcome? NO Dated: April 20, 2021 Britt M. Cobb (P69556) Attorney for Petitioner WILLEY & CHAMBERLAIN LLP 300 Ottawa Avenue, N.W., Suite 810 Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503 (616) 458-2212 3