Are Minnesota courts more interested in protecting a judge's reputation than the constitutional rights of the people?

ESTIONS PRESENTED 1, Are Minnesota courts more interested in protecting a judge’s reputation then the constitutional rights of the people? I. Did the trial judge have the right to deny a defendant's right to request counsel? . UL Are Minnesotan’s constitutional rights in jeopardy in order to secure wrongful convictions and keeping them through denials rather than relief? _.. . WW. Are Minnesotan’s entitled to an evidentiary hearing when there are witnesses and undisputed recorded evidence that clearly proves that the defendant was . unconstitutionally convicted and was unjustly denied relief by Minnesota courts in order to protect one of their own judge’s reputation blindsiding true justice in order to keep that wrongful, unlawful and unconstitutional conviction from being overturned? Vv. Will this honorable court allow Minnesota courts to sustain unconstitutional convictions? Q