Whether it is allowed for a judge to tell a jury who is biased to continue their belief in the defendant without a trial to defend against newly discovered DNA evidence

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | Wrewsy Ciscoved DIA Evideuc€, 18. tt Fare tok the ons tert Attorney * DNF Expert : (who hngpew to woek Poe the Ceauge Cty (ie Lab) to couduct A untiwish DNA stuly avd use it te lestity agniust me at tenil. The wwtivish pak? of the Dat stuch wns jd Zarek of me gKRtAtY, The Stucl completéd ays AFTER my tkA/T as it effective assistauce of Conbe/ whew Cosel kuéu) Aud! obi wot obj ce? fo wtinsh DW Stdohy Adee rey FeAl, OR Eve) 90 tO kas wy Ah such SHY that wns beng We As Testi by Stn 4€S 2-7-4 Ey peR7, | y Teri! courd Eetoe hoe rvscovduct. Is id allel fork A judge @ tel ov exter 10 tefl A july who iS okndbck bb 10 covtvue ols beenb uy withoy? lois! 2 defeyclau? Kowa Hug with dewial fa A Vew toatl Hobo of NEwhy discovered D-v-A Eviolence iv the olefewolant Pree. 9 was Wy (4 )kuxdeets am evemevt violated, when the Chde Aivolidlg df TAG Iyiag-Specia [ iv-weit special apedushivce 4 Neo fo was Wot Seupcorted by SubstAw hel CVE: OS