Whether Petitioners conviction is invalid when the evidence presented was legally insufficient to sustain a conviction

No question identified. : : Quecr-s0ne) PoesenHED ) © Whether Petitioners dawietion és initial when . idence pict leyally uot 10 Sustain a eovietion Violated Wis Fourteenth “Amendment right 4 Due Proeess Whether Petitions Que Provess right fo Material Prtulpatiry idence +o punshmert wes vilokd by the priceeutrs failure 40 relecse Hre suidence under bony WAS On err Hud had substarrtial dnd tnjurious Cae on He sentencing proceeding. List of Pherses Aut Parties appear in Yhe Caption of the Gest: on the ener page. i Questions Prosented i Liat of Putieg = i, alle of lonrts il “Tale of Authoritin Cited T, Lonstutin Statues, and Rules Tz, | ——Diitiat for Wei of oAionri I Dpintons lil. Swrisdiction ill Stalomnent 0 lace ww Reasons Lor Gardin g the titi I. Lonelusion b. Prov? of Sonvieo 4. Appenclents 8, | il | | Petrtgon toe Wer or Oemmmemer | Doditioner respectfully pyays Hut a Writ of Catiorari joule 1 rade f lyr vem ilonedd (oy dhe Fifth dour at Appeals of eyas a! Daltas. Qprarrons The Louis Fifth Dishiok Court oP Apyatls somo rienulum Opinion AFFirming Petitioners cowictut led mn Apel”, aco io wunpnbli shed. Before Justites pees, Hl paul lailyle. Opinion by Sushte Uariyle (eee: Appouerts) Wvessoceston | The dalean whieh, Hho FP, Distict lout ditppeale af Dallas devided vy tase vhs Avil 79000. A finely peat fy rears filed on August 31, dogo the lughest shade towel, Hrereater denied on, ther dale oP Seplember $0, 4090. An Gdbursion ob-time to file Ae petrian fr writol Corhovare was graaled 4p ul including 150 days aller {he lower bavets donial of Sealer 3h 2090 On. Plath 4060 The jurisdichon oF this éout °S trvokled yauter . J v5.05 (251(0), il STATE MEAN OF GABE Petitioner wes Charged with the offense of Figgrevalal Sonal fscault apd Tadionsy with a Child (a Trval loved Cause No. F-118005% , and F-19gojo4, “The alleged predieale Defenses was Honys where Petihonor fused & puuniShmentt Wage oF 26 aus fo LOPE imprisonment (# Bonvicled, Dn Maieh 14,264 Pelrhowr eniered a plav OL Nor Gustay 40 both alleged HfenseS before He Honorable Somes Fry, presiding in the 283% —— Gudieial Dishick Cyart. the yay enpall there afer Poul fetihiner Guilty gad assess {punishment in bath use in 55 (ar tontinement, the somentes Fun bonewrreartty, Pefhiongr fre achimely appeal 4p the Courts \ulgment anu Sonenee rendered, Gin agp! to Tos, SP Disicd Covet Aga at Dullas in cause NO. 05-1400405 ER anal 05-)4-00HObCR with he assiotauee oF appuinled Thal erunsél Presented m Issue one, anul fu0, The evidence wes legally msuttioiont fy Support the Comichins ob Aagreumied Sonal! Assault of a Child and Ladecenay With a child by dartact. In reones ree and four | | Peritiner Alleyed Ye tral taoeré One in glenying the hequested mishail onthe Is6ue of punshment, Hie Sale Lhiled to lease discovery pursuant fo -foyas ule of Evidente Rule HOA) and Arhele 34.00 See, 3G), Ln issues tive and six. etitimer alleged tye punishment charged erroneously allowed the ie fo. asses ofine not duthurried by Seetion 12 ah) om 4 se was astessed in purtof te jodgmnent ip wel, MO. On August 31,9090 Petitioner fle a pethin tor diserehin ii dhere ater the burt ald | rethew on Seplember 30, 3090 with Yhe Slates highest | Cont. . WV “