No. 20-790
Reginald Eric Sprowl v. Mercedes-Benz U.S. International, Inc.
Response Waived
Tags: burden-of-proof burden-shifting civil-procedure civil-rights disparate-treatment employment-discrimination mcdonnell-douglas prima-facie-case summary-judgment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity EmploymentDiscrimina
SocialSecurity EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference:
2021-01-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should the McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1978) burden shifting test remain a part of the summary judgment analysis?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Should the McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1978) burden shifting test remain a part of the summary judgment analysis? i
Docket Entries
2021-01-19
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-04
Waiver of right of respondent Mercedes-Benz U.S. International, Inc. to respond filed.
2020-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.
2020-12-23
Waiver of right of respondent Mercedes-Benz U.S. International, Inc. to respond filed.
2020-12-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 8, 2021)
Attorneys
Mercedes-Benz U.S. International, Inc.
Michael Lee Lucas — Burr & Forman LLP, Respondent
Michael Lee Lucas — Burr & Forman LLP, Respondent
Reginald Eric Sprowl
Lee David Winston — Winston Cooks, LLC, Petitioner
Lee David Winston — Winston Cooks, LLC, Petitioner