Was Petitioner denied a fair trial?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED T) Was Pettoner dened a fair tral when le aid everything in Wes power to pbtan clactty on how his wrthdiraw plea herring procedures furnchion (om relation 7° contesting charges) From |ai's wr but was completely ignored by counsel Guith evrdence nw me egal record conclusively showing Yhese circumstances +o be +r) . I) Did the STATE OF FLORIDA vercharge Pert toner with deadly Weapon enhancemenk$ departing Gam we essential req uirements of stechatory law) (when ewdence conclusively shows per law that Peb‘Honer's object was not used na deadly manner) § TIL. Prd the lower iq Judeerel Corcuck Ww bunal deny Pet toner qa Farr tral by aisww'ssina, Petitioner's Postconvicton molron for inehedtve assistunce of counsel when ihe facks show otherwise, and, atd + deny a Garr tral by bras ond proven Ubel om Reritboner when it tld Petit one it was “nor a tan of reobbernres at all when esrdence conclusively shows hak the lewer jae Ttadtaval Wrbunal ™m Lack prs a Lon of sobveries by Serrng anoiver moun Curl amore Severe reobery Yan Pelttoner) only A Years, but serving Petitroner with ZO years @