No. 20-7912
Jorge Gomez-Gomez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process judicial-discretion sentencing sentencing-guidelines substantive-reasonableness
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-06-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals erred by concluding that Petitioner's 99-month sentence was substantively reasonable
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the court of appeals erred by concluding that Petitioner’s 99-month sentence was substantively reasonable.
Docket Entries
2021-06-07
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
2021-05-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-04-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2021)
Attorneys
Jorge Gomez-Gomez
Doug Keller — The Law Office of Doug Keller, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent