No. 20-7921
Edward Shane West-El v. Mark J. Baker
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process employment-law judicial-hearing labor-rights overtime overtime-compensation standing tax-deduction wage-dispute wages
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Why is the Petitioner not being heard as of yet?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. In Earle v McVeigh, 91 US 503, 23 L Ed 398, it says “ Every person is entitled to an opportunity to be heard in a court of law upon every question involving his rights or ; interests, before he is affected by any judicial decision on the question.” Why is the Petitioner not being heard as of yet? 2. The Petitioner would like to know the reason why taxes were being deducted from his pay check, Secondly is the Petitioner getting the correct pay per hour as well as overtime, being the employee started work as a longshoremen in or around November 1996?
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-16
Waiver of right of respondent Mark J. Baker to respond filed.
2021-03-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 3, 2021)
Attorneys
Edward Shane West-El
Edward Shane West-El — Petitioner
Mark J. Baker
Rachelle Barston — Maersk Services USA, Respondent