No. 20-7937
Isaac Lee Loggins, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure civil-rights due-process ineffective-assistance-of-counsel standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-06-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower courts abused their discretion by not following well-established procedures and instead making decisions for their own convenience, which prejudiced the petitioner's ability to present their extraordinary circumstances
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. How DO WE DETERMINE IF A .PERSOEN of THEIR CIRCUMSTANCES ARE EXTRAORDINARY AND CompeLLine © I. Div. tHe LOWER CoURTS AMD HIS ASSIGNED COUNSEL PRETUDICE Locwins BY NoT Fellow Ne WELL-ESTABLISHED PROCEDURES And, INSTEAD, MAKING DECISIONS FoR “THEIR OWA Consvensience
Docket Entries
2021-06-07
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
2021-05-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-03-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 4, 2021)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent