Does the constitutional holding of Packingham v. North Carolina apply to offenders on supervised release?

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW This case involves an important question of constitutional law which has never been decided by this Court, and over which there is a conflict between the Eighth and Eleventh Circuits, on one side, and the Second and Third Circuits, on the other, to wit: Does the constitutional holding of Packingham v. North Carolina, 137 S. Ct. 1730 (2017) — which recognized a First Amendment right to access the Internet for sex offenders who had completed their sentences — apply to offenders on supervised release? i