Ernest H. Baker, III v. Oregon Department of Corrections, et al.
Whether the 15 Supreme Court justices are the last line of defense for religious freedom and the free exercise thereof?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Ts the 15 Supreme Court notthe last lene of deSenee For Cetrsens of +425 nateorn in otdec fo Protect Releqvous Freedonr” and the Free exececse treeeo? 2? Does not Staci Deersis and Set Precedent mother AN More un thers netron to ensuce Reop hee Stel have the tights of fe, rbecty and the Quacs eet of happiness TDoe<s Cleac Cut erdence ard lacs not mattec ane mtore oo Can Cousty cwe wotllynelle. and Contract, ty laross en Set Vcetedent? LS these things Stell mattec tlre Couct must lake +his Case. Especiall, Since at Ever, Tan asked te be regresented as Lin documented ental health and could hovel Cead and cote pecor fo Porson Goth only a 57 srade education . and Speeral ed. and have been denved though Tb A190 presented Case law Sor this aS C0O oo RILADS do not et "nr handrEaP s establish laws Contras, to Set -Yrece dent Jenin unto Id aynouatS oS ofless do be Strepped oF their Veleqrous FoeedowS coel/-~